Transcript of Good Fortune, Episode 19: Virtue

Virtue is at the heart of Stoicism. The point of Stoic practice is to create people who express virtue in their every action. And yet, for all its centrality in our philosophy, I find that virtue is often obscured in modern stoic teaching. There’s likely a wide variety of reasons for this, not the least being that it’s a difficult subject. Making virtue feel “solid” isn’t an easy task. I also suspect that the word “virtue” itself is tainted; linked to a religious history that makes non-theists or practitioners of other faiths wary of the term. But the good flow of life that Stoics have been seeking since 300 BCE is a virtuous path. A clear-headed view of the subject will help us focus our Stoic practice so that we aren’t simply resilient in the face of life, but actively creating a fulfilling life. This episode begins a series dedicated to the virtues, first in general, and then each principal virtue in turn.

Hi, I’m Matt Van Natta and this is Good Fortune.

Today’s questions:

How does Stoicism describe virtue?

But what is virtue?

How can we be virtuous?

Ok. Let’s get started.

[Raven Caw]

How does Stoicism describe virtue?

Virtue is the only good. That is a core Stoic principle. When Stoics use the word “good” we are talking about virtue, when we say bad, we’re discussing “vice” and when referencing subjects outside of moral categorization, we call a thing, “indifferent.”

The four primary facets of virtue are, wisdom, temperance, courage, and justice, each of which have their own sub-categories. We’ll explore this in later episodes.

These names, and a label like, “good,” aren’t enough though, right? Virtue is good, good is virtue but what do these words mean to Stoics? In Diogenes Laertius’s historical summary of Stoic philosophy, we learn a bit more about virtue. He tells us that Chyrsippus the “second founder” of Stoicism asserted that, “virtue is a consistent disposition of the mind, worth choosing for its own sake, without being influenced by fear and hope, or by anything external. Moreover, it is in virtue that happiness consists, for virtue is that state of the soul which tends to make the whole of one’s life harmonious.”

Here virtue is a disposition of the mind, a state of the soul that leads to the good flow of life. And in Stoicism, the disposition of our mind is a choice. We do not stumble into virtue, we enact virtue. Recall Epictetus’s list of things we control: our opinions, our aim, our desires and aversions. It is through the proper use of these things that we live out the virtuous life. So we can learn to live virtuously, virtue can be taught! The goal of Stoic teaching is to bring us to an understanding of virtue so that we will live virtuously.  This, by the way, is why Stoicism views vice or “evil” as a form of ignorance. Virtue, definitionally, leads us to happiness, to flourishing. Vicious choices are made with the intention of finding happiness as well, but the choice is a wrong one. Therefore the person living out a vice is misinformed about what best leads to a good life. They are ignorant of the better way.

Back to Diogenes’ history. The Stoics, “define good in a particular matter, as being what is perfectly in accord with nature for a rational being. And, secondly, they say that it is conformity to virtue, so that all actions which participate in virtue, and all good people, are themselves in some sense “good.” And in the third place, they speak of its consequences, joy, and gladness, and things like that.” Another synonym for virtue is excellence. To be virtuous is to be your moral best in a particular moment. Being excellent in this way leads to fulfillment, to happiness. So if we are going to participate in virtue in the hopes of enjoying consequences like joy and gladness, well, how exactly do we do that?

[Raven Caw]

What is virtue?

How should we understand virtue? Is it like the Force, from Star Wars; something we can tap into and utilize? Is it a universal rulebook, and if we follow some checklist, we can call ourselves virtuous? I’d like to share a metaphor and an analogy, the first from the past and the other from a contemporary scholar; both which shape my own understanding and practice of virtue.

The metaphor comes from the Roman statesman Cicero, who tells us that the Stoics referred to virtue as “ripeness.” I find ripeness to be a striking metaphor for the Stoic view of virtue. Ripe fruit, from a human point of view, is fruit at its peak. Ripeness is a particular mango or apple’s   best expression, wait too long and it’s rotten. Moral virtue, like ripeness, also has its moment, in that a virtuous action can only be taken in the present. You can’t store up virtue. “I did ten virtuous things this morning, I’m good for the day.” No. You can’t bring forth excellence from the past, you can perform it now, in the ripeness of this moment. In fact, I would say that virtue is also like fruit in that if you store it for too long it rots. Too many people justify selfishness in the moment citing their supposed goodness in the past. Stoicism does not let us rest on our laurels. You don’t get a pass for being a jerk today because you tend to be nice most of the time. We are told that a person who is virtuous in a single moment is, at that time, just as virtuous as the mythic Stoic Sage who is at all times virtuous. Conversely, to enact a vice is to be as vicious as anyone else in that moment. That harm is not mitigated by your better self from yesterday. The immediate nature of virtue isn’t to say that the past practice of virtue is useless. Practice is a necessary part of building up our consistency in virtue and, hopefully, when we stumble our past practice helps us get back on the right path quickly. Still, it’s only in this particular moment where we can be our best self, or something else. A Stoic chooses to pursue a life of ripeness.

The analogy I would like to share comes from Julia Annas and is found in her book Intelligent Virtue. Virtue is a practical skill. Now the thought that virtue is a skill is also found in the Stoic literature, but I want to discuss the ins and outs of the analogy as found in Annas’s work. In her view, virtue is like a practical skill in that it must be practiced, and that practice involves learning, understanding, and an aspiration on the part of the practitioner to become better.

In the skill analogy we must differentiate between a practical skill and mere routine. A person with a disposition of virtue is engaged in the practice of that virtue, they are not acting mindlessly. To clarify this, Annas contrasts learning the route to work versus learning to play the piano. Yes, learning the way to work takes some skill, but it quickly becomes a routine. Contrast that to piano playing which demands a greater engagement of the mind if the person is striving to become a skilled player. In the same way, a just person does not stumble into justice, but has an understanding of justice and applies themself towards enacting it.

Also like a practical skill, virtue requires a learning process and, through that process, a deepening understanding of the virtue through that learning. A chess player learns how the individual pieces move, but eventually learns strategies as well as how to apply those strategies against an opponent. We also need to learn virtue. What does it mean for me to be excellent in a certain context? And as we learn that, we in turn must deepen our understanding so as to be free to apply virtue towards an ever changing world.

To gain that understanding we also have to have an aspirational mindset. We must want and choose to be virtuous. As Annas puts it, “where the aspiration to improve fails, we relapse into simple repetition and routine.” We must be engaged with our virtue or it isn’t really virtue. Which brings me to a final aspect of the skill analogy.

Virtue only happens in a particular place, a particular time, or in Annas’s terms, virtue takes place in an “embedded context.” Another quote. “We always learn to be virtuous in a given context, there is no such thing as just learning to be generous or loyal in the abstract.” This comes up constantly in the old Stoic literature. Epictetus and Musonius did not care if you could talk about Stoic justice or courage or temperance if you were not just, courageous, and temperate in your life, among your friends, and in interaction with the strangers you meet. Virtue is a practical skill that requires learning and continual practice if a virtuous disposition is to be realized. A Stoic chooses to participate in virtue. So how do we do that?

[Raven Caw]

How can we be virtuous?

Practice makes perfect or, at least, it keeps us on the path of improvement. Musonius Rufus said that, “the person who wants to be good must not only learn the lessons which pertain to virtue but train themself to follow them eagerly and rigorously.”

No student entered the Stoa as a virtuous person. A Stoic teacher’s mission was to strip away years of misguided thinking so that a student could begin to think clearly about life and finally learn how to truly flourish. Society told them that money was good, prestige was good, safety was good. Stoicism says the good is found in you, in your character. It says that a virtuous disposition leads to joy and gladness, no matter your access to power and resources. If this philosophy doesn’t shift our point of view towards virtue, and if our actions do not reflect that change, then we’re wasting our time. And the only way this change will come is if we challenge ourselves. We must examine our notions of the world and change them. We must practice new ways of interacting with people and with the world. Again, from Musonius, “practicing each virtue always must follow learning the lessons appropriate to it, or it is pointless for us to learn about it.”

In upcoming episodes we’ll look at the virtuous dispositions. We’ll puzzle over wisdom, and justice, temperance, and courage. Focusing on these facets of virtue will, hopefully, provide us with specific areas of practice. Still, I know that just the concepts we’ve covered today have helped me. I meditate on ripeness and on what parts of my life and in what moments of my life I’ve been unripe or rotten. I work to take my growth in the skill of virtue seriously. I want to apply the same effort towards my character that I would to any other life skill. Virtue is the point. It’s an old term, but it’s a fresh perspective for most of us.

Do you embody virtue? Are your actions so in harmony with the world that you can claim a good flow of life, one that brings forth joy? Every moment provides the opportunity to do things well, with excellence. Musonius said you can eat with virtue. Epictetus said you could bathe virtuously. Most importantly, we can interact virtuously with other people. Again, the next episodes will focus on specifics, but you don’t need to wait to redouble your effort to be your best self. You can do that right now.

[Raven Caw]

Thank you for listening to Episode 19 of Good Fortune. Good Fortune is hosted on SoundCloud and can be found on iTunes, Stitcher, and many other places. If you are willing to leave reviews on those services, they are always appreciated. The music is by Tryad off of their album Public Domain.

My books, The Beginner’s Guide to Stoicism and The 5-Minute Stoic Journal are available wherever books are sold. My self-published book, The Good Fortune Handbook, is available on Amazon and its sales directly support this podcast and ImmoderateStoic.com. If you’ve read and enjoyed that one, it could really use some reviews.

And finally, always remember, 'misfortune born nobly is good fortune.' And therefore, I wish you all good fortune until next time.

[Raven Caw]

Transcript of Good Fortune, Episode 18: Conflict

Before I get started, the following episode concerns the Stoic approach to personal conflict which is, in most instances, to not engage in conflict. I believe that a different position exists concerning defense of others, rather than ourselves, but that is not what I will be discussing. Also, this episode is, like all Good Fortune episodes, short, and therefore will not cover all aspects of Stoics versus conflict, even the personal conflict that I’m addressing. So if you are now, or are ever, in a situation of abuse of any kind, please understand that you are valuable and that your physical and emotional well-being is worth protecting. Seeking safety and defending yourself in such circumstances is just, wise, courageous, and Stoic. Be well.

[Raven Caw]

My new book, The Beginner’s Guide to Stoicism is available wherever books are sold and has just been released as an audio book. A second book, The 5-Minute Stoicism Journal, is also available now. As my publisher puts it, “Want to remain focused, content, confident―even joyful―no matter what challenges life throws your way? The 5-Minute Stoicism Journal can show you how to develop emotional resilience and cultivate a positive mindset by focusing your attention on what you can control in your life.” You can find links to both of these books as well as to The Good Fortune Handbook on ImmoderateStoic.com. Thanks.

[Raven Caw]

"Consider the things that people think injure them when they are experienced; none of these things will in fact injure them or cause them shame. These things include being jeered at, beaten, or spat upon, with assaults being the worst of these outrages...If a philosopher cannot scorn blows or jeering, they are useless, inasmuch as a philosopher must make it clear that they scorn even death." (Musonius Rufus, from the lecture on whether a philosopher will file a suit against someone for assault)

Throughout the surviving literature we find, again and again, that Stoics do not engage in retribution, tit for tat strategies, nor even self-defense. This is consistent and it is difficult. How are we supposed to let slights go, or moreso, injuries? Why would we? And didn’t the Stoics use the Spartans, Hercules, and other warriors as examples of wise behavior? Certainly they took the offensive, so what gives?

Hi, I’m Matt Van Natta and this is Good Fortune.

Today’s questions:

What is the Stoic view of personal conflict?

How does a Stoic respond to conflict?

How does this radical viewpoint apply to life today?

Alright, let’s get started.

[Raven Caw]

What is the Stoic view of conflict?

Last episode I mentioned that the teacher Musonius Rufus claimed a philosopher would never take a person to court for assault. That’s a big idea to mention offhandedly, so I thought I’d deal with it now. After all, isn’t Stoicism a strong philosophy? Aren’t Stoics stand on your own two feet types? Why is Musonius letting people slap him around? Well, let’s hear what he has to say.

In the third line of his lawsuit lecture, Musonius says, "Those who do not know what is really good and what is really shameful, and those who are overly concerned with their own fame - these people think that they are being injured if someone glares at them, laughs at them, hits them, or mocks them. But a person who is thoughtful and sensible - as a philosopher should be - is disturbed by none of these things. They believe that the shame comes not in being insulted but in behaving in an insulting manner. What wrong does the person who experiences wrong do? The person who does wrong, however, is thereby shamed."

This is both straightforward and a lot to unpack. As a kid I heard that sticks and stones might break my bones but words would never hurt me. Musonius not only places words in the category of things that don’t hurt but he includes the sticks and stones. This is because the only harm he is concerned with is the moral harm that comes from a lack of personal virtue. Again, “what wrong does the person who experiences wrong do?” Nothing. The only person morally harmed by jeers, mocking, even assault, is the person who does those shameful things. In Musonius’ view, the only way he could be harmed in such a situation (again, he means morally harmed) would be if he were to respond inappropriately to the situation; if he were to repay vice with his own viciousness. He goes on to say, (line 5) "and I could name many other men who were targets of abuse, some verbally attacked and others injured by physical attacks. They appear neither to have defended themselves against their attackers nor to have sought revenge." I can’t say if he’s drawing this list of men from stories or from Stoics that he knew, but he is claiming that his point of view is practical in that it has been practiced; others have walked this path and we too can choose to not be harmed and to not do harm. 

Before I move on, I want to point out that the adversary in question does offend. The phrase, “what wrong does the person who experiences wrong do,” explicitly states that a wrong was experienced. Stoicism is not absolving the offender from wrongdoing.The point is that you need not respond in kind, or even need to respond at all.

So the Stoic answer to most conflict is, “what conflict?” From our viewpoint, the only thing we control in a conflict is our own actions, and we are aiming for excellence. Marcus Aurelius said that the proper response to a person who means us harm is, “No, no, my friend. That isn't what you're here for. It isn't me who's harmed by that. It's you.” (Meditations 11:18) Stoics choose to not engage in conflict, in fact, we attempt to turn conflict into cooperation. We want the absolute best for others, and that includes our adversaries. Yes, there are times where we must defend things vehemently, for the good of all, but when it comes to attacks on our individual character and even our body, we can choose to be Stoically invincible.

[Raven Caw]

How does a Stoic respond to conflict?

"What then has been given to you with which to meet this attack? If you seek to act like a wolf, you can bite back and throw more stones than your neighbor did. but if you seek to act like a human, examine your store, see what faculties you brought into the world? You brought no faculty of brutality, did you? No faculty of bearing grudges, did you? When then is a horse miserable? Not when he can't sing "cuckoo!" but when he can't run...Does it not follow then, that on the same principles a human is wretched, not when they are unable to choke lions...but when they have lost their kindness and faithfulness?" (Epictetus 4:5:12-14)

In any challenge, we should look for our capacities to face it. When stuck in traffic we draw on patience. If good work requires a long commitment, we test our endurance. What tools do we have during personal conflict?

Epictetus listed in that last quote, both kindness and faithfulness as faculties that meet the challenges found in conflict. Further, he states that drawing on these tools is as fulfilling to our humanity as running is to a horse! This is important. Stoicism doesn’t recommend a subdued approach to conflict as an exercise in masochism and it certainly doesn’t seek to subject us to abusers. No. We Stoics act as we do because it allows us to thrive and it is when we are thriving that we are most capable of making this world better.

We are not asked simply to disengage from conflict. Musonius, for instance, suggests that we model a better way of life. (line 6) "It is characteristic of a civilized and humane temperament not to respond to wrongs as a beast would and not to be implacable towards those who offend, but to provide them with a model of decent behavior."

Epictetus agreed with his teacher, Musonius, and added that we should work to diffuse other people’s conflicts, when possible. In Discourses Book 4:5:1 he says, "the good and excellent person does not contend with anyone, nor, as far as they have the power, do they allow others to contend."

Marcus Aurelius echoed these views as well. In Meditations 11:18, point 9 of a 10 point list says that, “kindness is invincible, provided it's sincere - not ironic or an act. What can even the most vicious person do if you keep treating him with kindness and gently set him straight - if you get the chance - correcting him cheerfully at the exact moment he's trying to do you harm. "No, no, my friend. That isn't what you're here for. It isn't me who's harmed by that. It's you."

To the Stoic, being wronged is just another opportunity to make things right. Epictetus listed kindness as a core human faculty. Marcus says that kindness is invincible, provided it is sincere. The Stoics viewed all humans as part of a single organism and viewed discord between people as a wound that affects all of us. The Stoic attempts to remain undisturbed by our adversaries, not as a feat of strength, but so that we can use our healthy mind to heal the division between ourselves and others, if at all possible.

I was recently reminded of advice given by the English evangelist John Wesley that could easily have come from a Stoic teacher,

"Do all the good you can.

By all the means you can.

In all the ways you can.

In all the places you can.

At all the times you can.

To all the people you can.

As long as ever you can."

[Raven Caw]

How does this radical viewpoint apply to life today?

We certainly do not have to agree with everything any particular ancient Stoic says, not even if you consider yourself, like I do, a practicing Stoic. Sometimes we’re just looking at one individual’s opinion. Sometimes we’re looking at an opinion based on flawed reasoning, or on a set of “facts” that have been superseded by later learning. Beyond that, in the end we have to act according to our own reason and moral conscience.

What I find important about Musonius Rufus’s hard line concerning personal defense is that he rests his arguments in the core beliefs of Stoicism. He claims that internalizing the values of the philosophy will naturally lead us to accept jeers and blows as inconsequential and that our response to such events will be one of love and reasoned instruction for our adversary rather than any form of retaliation. Musonius was not just a Roman Stoic, he ran the school in Rome. His students were primarily young Roman men; sons of the elite. This is who he was talking to when he said defending yourself is a form of philosophical cowardice. His words would have been received as an attack on their sense of what it meant to be a man. Musonius new what he was doing. He liked to say that people should leave his lectures not pleased, but pained. He was challenging his students to follow Stoic beliefs to their logical end. He was showing them that the philosophy reshapes the people that practice it, assuming that they are making progress.  I think that it is necessary to wrestle with this Stoic viewpoint for the same reason that Musonius presented it to his students. If we aren’t consistently challenging our own definitions of self and identity, as well as our considerations of how to act in this world, I don’t know how we could claim to be progressing in our own journey. The three Stoics we’ve just looked at, Musonius, Epictetus, and Marcus, all saw the role of a Stoic in conflict to be one of restoration. I agree wholeheartedly. Our adversary is making a mistake, and their choices are creating division. Embracing the Stoic viewpoint frees us to refuse to perpetuate that harm and to instead actively seek something better. I also agree with Musonius’s radical position that a Stoic might accept physical harm rather than return violence with violence. I don’t expect all modern Stoics to land in the same place concerning self-defense; but the viewpoint I’ve expressed is the natural outcome of the Stoic approach to the world, so I would hope dissenters have a clear reason for what they believe. Stoicism is a philosophy that asks us to embrace the world and that is difficult to do with a closed fist.

A key Stoic virtue is courage. And Stoic courage is shown by acting with excellence no matter what the world has in store. In the same discourse that I’ve already drawn from, Epictetus defines the character of a Stoic. "They are gentle, generous, patient, affectionate.’ Give this person to me, I accept them, I make them a citizen, I accept them as a neighbor and a fellow-voyager." I would like to be accepted into this fellowship as well. I hope you can be a fellow-voyager as well.

[Raven Caw]

Thank you for listening to Episode 18 of Good Fortune. You may have noticed a change in the interstitial caws. Last month my old computer died and presently the old episode files are stuck on an inaccessible hard-drive. I had to recreate a few things.

Good Fortune is hosted on SoundCloud and can be found on iTunes, Stitcher, and many other places. If you are willing to leave reviews on those services, they are always appreciated. The music is by Tryad off of their album Public Domain.

And finally, always remember, 'misfortune born nobly is good fortune.' And therefore, I wish you all good fortune until next time.

[Raven Caw]

Transcript of Good Fortune, Episode 17: The Stoic Fool

Before we begin: My new book, The Beginner's Guide to Stoicism, published by Althea Press, is available for pre-order on Amazon and will be released October 8th. More on that at the end of the episode. The Good Fortune Handbook, my self-published book, has been recently re-edited (I fixed most of the spelling errors) and is also available through Amazon. The Good Fortune Handbook consists of the transcripts of thirteen Good Fortune podcast episodes along with additional posts from the website, Immoderate Stoic. Whether you read it cover to cover, or use the helpful appendixes to jump to specific questions about Stoic practice, this handbook is a useful companion on your Stoic journey. Available as an ebook and in print, if you'd like to support this podcast, picking up a copy of The Good Fortune Handbook is a wonderful way to do so. Thanks.

[Raven Caw]

"If you would improve, be content to be thought foolish and dull with regard to externals. Do not desire to be thought to know anything; and though you should appear to others to be somebody, distrust yourself. For be assured, it is not easy on the one hand to keep your will in harmony with nature, and on the other to secure externals; but while you are absorbed in the one, you must of necessity neglect the other." (Enchiridion, 13)

Are you ready to be considered a fool? If you walk a Stoic path, if you truly embody Stoic values, it's likely that that label, or similar, is coming. Why? Well, let's look into it.

Hi. I'm Matt Van Natta and this is Good Fortune. Today's questions:

Why would practitioners of a wisdom philosophy be considered foolish?

What benefit is there to being foolish in the Stoic way?

How can I be certain I'm being Stoically foolish and not generally foolish?

Alright, let's get started...

[Raven Caw]

Why would practitioners of a wisdom philosophy be considered foolish?

It may have seemed strange, shocking even, to a new Stoic student attending Epictetus' lecture to hear that the world might consider them foolish for living as a philosopher. They had, after all, entered the school to learn about wisdom from the wise in order to themselves become wise. So in what way could anyone consider them foolish? Of course, any student who had spent time under Epictetus' tutelage would certainly begin to flesh out a picture of what he was alluding to. They could have heard their teacher say this line, recorded in Chapter 12 of the Enchiridion, "if you wish to make progress abandon reasoning of this sort, 'if I neglect my affairs, I will have nothing to live on..." They may have heard of the teachings of Musonius Rufus, the prior head of the school who said that he would, "never file a lawsuit for assault, nor would anyone who thinks that the study of philosophy is worthwhile..." That same Musonius who would not protect his honor in court was also keen to tell his rich students that their estates were worthless. He asked, "isn't it more praiseworthy to help a lot of people than to live expensively? Isn't spending money on people more noble than spending it on wood and stone?" In all this and so much more it becomes apparent that the values of Stoicism did not readily align with the values of Roman society. In fact, few urban societies past or present (particularly those that would be deemed conventionally successful) could enthusiastically endorse the Stoic approach to externals. And it's in the category of externals that Stoics can expect to be considered fools.

What is an external? It's anything that isn't under your control and, by that definition, externals are nearly everything. Your property, your reputation, your own body, all these are considered external to your core self; your ability to choose. If you've heard earlier episodes you're already well acquainted with the dichotomy of control; that there are things which you control and others that you do not. You also understand that Stoicism asks you to focus your attention on the things you control. It's that decision, to aim your time and attention first towards your moral choices that courts the label "foolish" from others. Many societies, many people, expect and often demand that you treat externals as important in themselves, but the Stoic interacts with externals through the lens of moral decision. Is a raise important? Well, more money is useful when it supports wise action, but detrimental if it leads to vice. So a raise is fine as long as I don't compromise myself to obtain that raise and if my gain is not to the detriment of others."That bond measure would hurt my property value." Perhaps, but it would also lift up those in need, so support it wholeheartedly. This is what Epictetus means when he says, "be assured, it is not easy on the one hand to keep your will in harmony with nature, and on the other to secure externals." Stoicism calls on us to focus our energy on strengthening our personal virtue, and that rarely leads to an accumulation of external wealth.

Epictetus' newer students might have thought, "well, if I gain externals through virtue, what isn't admirable about that? I'll be seen as a good citizen! Hardly any reason to call me a fool."  It wouldn't take long to uproot those thoughts. Chapter 39 of the Enchiridion records Epictetus speaking on the Stoic sense of value. We looked at it just last episode. Again, Epic says that, "Each person's body is a measure for their property, just as the foot is a measure for the shoe. If, then, you abide by this principle, you will maintain the proper measure, but if you go beyond it, you cannot help but fall headlong over a precipice, as it were, in the end. So also in the case of your shoe; if once you go beyond the needs of the foot, you get first a gilded shoe, then a purple one, then an embroidered one. For once you go beyond the measure there is no limit." Our choice of external goods should be focused on meeting our basic human needs, according to this view. A well fitted shoe is a lovely thing. Dye it in expensive purple? Not if you're Stoic. So even though both the plain shoes and the purple pair are, in themselves, what Stoicism refers to as indifferents (in that they don’t directly impact our virtue) the Stoics still taught a constraint on our choices. Why? Because the choice of shoe does impact our virtue.

Where did all this lead? Towards a radically different value system than what was adopted by the Roman elite. One more Enchiridion chapter, number 24 in its entirety. "Let not reflections such as these afflict you: 'I shall live without honor, and never be of any account': for if lack of honor is an evil, no one but yourself can involve you in evil any more than in shame. Is it your business to get office or to be invited to an entertainment? Certainly not. Where then is the dishonor you talk of? How can you be 'of no account anywhere', when you ought to count for something in those matters only which are in your power, where you may achieve the highest worth? 'But my friends,' you say, 'will lack assistance.' What do you mean by 'lack assistance'? They will not have cash from you and you will not make them Roman citizens. Who told you that to do these things is in our power, and not dependent upon others? Who can give to another what is not theirs to give? 'Get them then,' says he, 'that we may have them.' If I can get them and keep my self-respect, honor, magnanimity, show the way and I will get them. But if you call on me to lose the good things that are mine, in order that you may win things that are not good, look how unfair and thoughtless you are. And which do you really prefer? Money, or a faithful, modest friend? Therefore help me rather to keep these qualities, and do not expect from me actions which will make me lose them. 'But my country,' they say, 'will lack assistance, so far as lies in me.' Once more I ask, What assistance do you mean? It will not owe colonnades or baths to you. What of that? It does not owe shoes to the blacksmith or arms to the shoemaker; it is sufficient if each person fulfills their own function. Would you do it no good if you secured to it another faithful and modest citizen? 'Yes." Well then you would not be useless to it. 'What place then shall I have in the city?' Whatever place you can hold while you keep your character for honor and self-respect. But if you are going to lose these qualities in trying to benefit your city, what benefit, I ask, would you have done her when you attain to the perfection of being lost to shame and honor?"

Stoicism was a popular philosophy among the Roman elite, yet here is a teacher of the Roman Stoa telling the sons of free citizens, landholders, senators, that pursuing virtue will take your attention away from the accumulation of wealth and power. What explains that? Perhaps all the Stoic students went on to thread the needle of living out virtue while gaining power? This seems unlikely, but let's hope. History doesn't let me know Epicetus' students well, but it lets me know him. Epic challenged people to become who they should be and he presented Stoicism as it could be, if anyone bothered to follow it to its logical end. This Stoic teacher claimed that Stoicism well-lived would challenge others' perceptions in a way that would make many scoff. So why would we want to become a Stoic? What's the benefit?

[Raven Caw]

What benefit is there to being foolish in the Stoic way?

Epictetus taught that we can not live virtuously and obtain everything. What is off limits to the Stoic? Anything that would require an un-virtuous action to gain or sustain. Again from Chapter 24, "If I can get them and keep my self-respect, honor, magnanimity, show the way and I will get them." Depending on the time and place in which one lives, you may be unable to partake in much of what the world has to offer and remain virtuous. So what does Stoicism offer in exchange? Just austerity? No. It offers fulfillment. The outcome of Stoic living is a flourishing life in which you are content within yourself while you work joyfully to benefit others. That is the natural by-product of virtue.

I just painted myself into a corner because I have to explain virtue and its benefits and still keep this episode tight. Thankfully I did talk a lot about virtue in Episode 16: Progress, where virtue is shown to be the sole Stoic measure of moral progress. So you have either already heard that one or can go back to it. Here I'll get basic. Virtue is the art of living in harmony with the world. It is about how you interact with the challenges of life. Virtue is contextual. As Julia Annas put it in Intelligent Virtue, "We always learn to be virtuous in a given context; there is no such thing as just learning to be generous or loyal in the abstract." You can only enact virtue in the particular moment at hand; you can't store it up. When the gymnast Simone Biles landed a triple double during her floor routine, all her hard labor, consistent practice, and persistent dedication, added up to that moment, but it was only in that moment that a particular type of perfection could be enacted. Virtue is just like that moment. You always have the opportunity to be your best self in the present situation. If you choose to be your best, you create the conditions that allow you to remain content and fulfilled no matter your situation where externals are concerned. Zeno would speak of the "good flow of life." That flow is virtue. It's a person moving through life with grace and in harmony with all things. This immediate nature of virtue is at the root of why living out virtue and making gains in externals is often at odds. Virtue is enacted in how you obtain things and how you use them. Choosing vice isn't a decision to miss out on building up a bigger store of Justice in your virtue reserves (there is no such thing). Vice is a decision to derail your harmonious life and there is no guarantee that you can easily get back on track. This is why Epictetus constantly reminds his students to make the moral choice first, to aim for virtue. If an additional gift comes with it, awesome. If not, you still win, because you remained in harmony.

Stoicism's purpose is to focus you on expressing virtue. Wisdom, Justice, Courage, and Moderation; these are the "good things that are mine," referenced by Epictetus in Enchiridion 13 and those are the things that can be lost by aiming at externals. Epictetus' students were being asked to help their country in the wrong way. Rome had enough colonnades. It didn't have enough people focused on justice. It didn't have enough people enacting moderation; fulfilling their personal needs then using the excess to fulfill others' bodily needs instead of their own wants. Epictetus' students were being told to fight over Rome's scraps to gain wealth or a moment's glory. But virtue requires no competition; it's gained through humane and harmonious actions. The only person we battle for virtue is ourself.  You benefit yourself and society by aiming to be the best version of you in every moment. The Stoic is a fool concerning externals because the path towards wisdom takes us elsewhere. So where does that leave us? What social position can a Stoic have in life? "Whatever place you can hold while you keep your character for honor and self-respect." If society honors virtue, you can gain whatever becomes available to you. If society honors externals then there will be challenges, but if you can face them virtuously and still make gains, go for it. When society honors vice, you can expect opposition. Being called a fool may be the least of your worries. Ask Socrates.

If being called a fool sounds difficult, but the idea of living out virtue sounds appealing, you will need to make some effort to not be shaken by the occasional taunt. One way to deal with this would be Negative Visualization. You would visualize people, perhaps specific ones, treating you poorly for all your attempts at Stoic living. This would, at the least, inoculate you against future injury. As Seneca said, "that which you've anticipated comes as less of a shock." The higher purpose of Negative Visualization is to allow you time to reframe an event into a Stoic perspective. You remind yourself that other people's viciousness does not hurt you, morally. Only you can hurt your virtuous self. You could recall that vicious actions come from ignorance of a better way, this could stimulate Stoic pity for your adversaries rather than embarrassment or anger. Visualizing future challenges gives you a chance to practice virtuous responses.

There's another practice that I find works well when attempting to stand strong in the face of opposition. Imagine a person who you admire watching you triumph over adversity. The ancient Stoics had a variety of people they contemplated; Hercules the Hero, Diogenes the Cynic, Zeno the Founder of Stoicism. They would look to these people as examples to be followed, and would sometimes recall those ideal people in their moments of struggle as an encouragement. I'm looking at a bust of Zeno right now. He helps me focus. I'm reminded that he was just a person trying to live well and that he wrestled with issues that are not far removed from my own. I also have a portrait of the abolitionist John Brown on my wall. He helps me recall my moral courage. I also like to imagine the response of a favorite literary character to my circumstances,her name is Limpopo from the book Walkaway by Cory Doctorow. She reminds me of how I would like to walk through the world. She's fictional, but so is Hercules.

Be willing to be foolish. The world needs you at your best, even if it sometimes asks for something different. Of course, we can't always take an insult as a badge of honor. It is possible we're wrong. But how can we know?

[Raven Caw]

How can I be certain I'm being Stoically foolish and not generally foolish?

As I record this, I realize how much this episode is a companion piece to Episode 16: Progress. In that episode I ended by asking you to hold yourself up against Seneca's definition of the Stoic school. Here I ask you to develop a conception of virtue. Allow me to rework a line from Epictetus' Discourses 1:4, why do you divert yourself from consciousness of your own shortcomings? Are you not willing to seek the work of virtue, that you might learn where to look for progress? The expected outcome of Stoic practice is excellence as expressed by the Stoic model of virtue. Can you define Wisdom, for yourself? What about Courage, or Moderation, or Justice? How can we enact justice if we are unclear what our aims are? We Stoics must wrestle with virtue.

When we look at the lectures of the Stoic teachers, Epictetus and Musonius Rufus, we see an insistence that Stoicism is challenging. No one is praised as a natural Stoic who just gets it. No one walks into the Stoa with the right idea about virtue. They came to the school to learn virtue. Epictetus once cried out during class, "someone, anyone, show me a Stoic!"  All this to say, Stoicism takes effort. Look into virtue. What is it? How do you enact it? Pay attention to the word when it shows up in Stoic writing. How is it described? If you want a deeper dive I highly recommend Julia Annas' book, Intelligent Virtue. However you pursue a knowledge of virtue, pursue it. Virtue is the aim of Stoicism. The outcome of the Discipline of Desire is not simply less anxiety it is more Courage. And that courage was a specific thing. You have to know what you're trying to obtain to have any hope of getting it.

Of course, growth in virtue is a lifelong pursuit. I certainly am not consistently virtuous. How should we deal with incomplete knowledge? Stand strong in what you believe, leave room to have your mind changed. Epictetus, when talking to his students, told them, "When you do a thing because you have determined that it ought to be done, never avoid being seen doing it, even if the opinion of the multitude is going to condemn you. For if your action is wrong, then avoid doing it altogether, but if it is right, why do you fear those who will rebuke you wrongly?" (Enchiridion, 35) When you take a bold, unpopular action, can you defend it? If so, if you are acting in opposition to others in order to be on the side of virtue, if you’re giving up external gains to hold onto your moral character, then you're being foolish in exactly the right way. Keep it up.

[Raven Caw]

Thank you for listening to episode seventeen of Good Fortune. As to the news, I was hired to write a book and it will be available soon. The Beginner's Guide to Stoicism: Tools for Emotional Resilience and Positivity, will be released by Althea Press on October 8th and is available for pre-order right now. You can find a link to it on ImmoderateStoic.com. It's a practical, accessible introduction to the philosophy. I aimed to support the reader in laying a solid foundation on which to grow their future practice. If you like what you hear on Good Fortune, I think you'll enjoy The Beginner's Guide to Stoicism. And thank you all for your support over the years. If not for you, I would not have been approached for this project.

Good Fortune is hosted on SoundCloud and can be found on iTunes, Stitcher, and many other places. If you are willing to leave reviews on those services, they are always appreciated. Along with that, I would also appreciate reviews of The Good Fortune Handbook. If you find it useful, please take a moment to let others know.

The music is by Tryad off of their album Public Domain.

And finally, always remember, 'misfortune born nobly is good fortune.' And therefore, I wish you all good fortune until next time.

[Raven Caw]


Transcript of Good Fortune, Episode 16: Progress

Before we begin: The Good Fortune Handbook is available through Amazon and Kobo. The Good Fortune Handbook consists of the transcripts of thirteen Good Fortune podcast episodes along with additional posts from the website, Immoderate Stoic. Whether you read it cover to cover, or use the helpful appendixes to jump to specific questions about Stoic practice, this handbook is a useful companion on your Stoic journey. Available as an ebook and in print, if you'd like to support this podcast picking up a copy of The Good Fortune Handbook is a wonderful way to do so. Thanks.

[Raven Caw]

Today I'll be discussing progress. Past Good Fortune episodes have already covered everything from starting and ending our day, to dealing with bad news, handling jerks, and even wrestling with death. With so much of life covered...how are we all doing? As Stoic prokoptons (progressors) how are we actually progressing? What does Stoic progress even look like? Let's uncover how the ancient teachers defined Stoic progress and how they suggested we work towards that progress. 

Hi, I'm Matt Van Natta and this is Good Fortune. Today's questions:

  • How do Stoics define Progress?

  • How does a Stoic practice the philosophy?

  • How can we know if we're missing the point of Stoicism?

[Raven Caw]

How do Stoics define Progress?

In Book 1 of Epictetus' Discourses, Chapter 4, we have a recording of the teacher speaking specifically about progress. During this lecture, Epictetus defines progress in our philosophy while also addressing pitfalls; faux indicators of progress that were to be avoided. It opens this way;

"Those who are making progress, having learned from the philosophers that desire is for things good and aversion is towards things evil, and having learned that serenity and calm are not attained by anyone save they succeed in securing the objects of desire and they avoid encountering the objects of aversion -- such a one has utterly excluded desire from themselves, or else deferred it to another time, and feels aversion only towards the things which involve freedom of choice."

So the Stoic progressor has internalized and begun enacting the Discipline of Desire; on of our three main disciplines (the others concerning Assent and Action). The fundamentals of the Discipline of Desire are probably most succinctly expressed in Chapter Two of the Enchiridion if you need a review. The basic concept is that our desires contain a promise, an expectation that we will obtain what we want. The same with aversions, we hope to always avoid that which we seek to avoid. Stoicism points out that if we desire or avoid things that we can not actually control, we're bound to be disappointed. As Epictetus continues in his discourse;

"For if they avoid anything that is not a matter of free choice, they know that at some time they will encounter something in spite of their aversion to it, and will encounter grief."

Stoics sidestep these disappointments by aiming our desires only at things we can control. We desire only to act according to virtue and we seek to avoid nothing other than poor choices. Much, much easier said than done, but this is Stoicism. Attainment of virtuous, artful actions is the sole marker of real Stoic progress. And yet society often convinces Stoics to aim for goals other than virtue. In Discourse 1:4 we find Epictetus chastising his students for using things other than virtuous actions as "progress markers."

"Now if it is virtue that holds out the promise to create happiness and calm and serenity, then assuredly progress towards virtue is progress toward each of these states of mind... How come, then, since we acknowledge virtue to be this sort of thing, we seek progress and make a display of progress in other things?"

I assume there are many ways Epic's students missed the mark concerning Stoic progress. Perhaps some Stoics were prideful about their ability to hold up under pain. Other's may have found status in minimalism. "Oh, you have a coat. I just have this toga, but you do you." In Discourses 1:4 the problem was book learnin'. We find Epictetus mocking one student for praising another student's grasp of Chrysippus. Chrysippus, you may recall, was the third head of the Stoic school and his writings were credited as elevating Stoicism from a just a group of people who liked what Zeno had said to a full on legit philosophy. Important stuff. Chrysippus' writing was also famously difficult to understand. So it is pretty impressive that a newer student had a decent grasp of Chrysippus' works. Still Epictetus dismisses the bookworm's accomplishments and more so, digs into the student that praised him. Why? Because praise for book-learning had nothing to do with the point of Stoicism. Or as Epictetus asks the student;

"Why do you try to divert him from consciousness of his own shortcomings? Are you not willing to show him the work of virtue, that he might learn where to look for progress?"

And where is that progress found? Again:

"In desire and aversion, that you may not miss what you desire and encounter what you would avoid, in choice and refusal, that you may commit no fault therein; in giving and withholding assent of judgement, that you may not be deceived."

True Stoicism is found in the creation of a Stoic mind that is bent towards virtuous actions, everything else is at best, a means to that end. Epictetus compares the well read student to an athlete. Show me your shoulders, demands Epictetus. Here are my weights, says the athlete. Get out of here with your weights, the teacher exclaims, I want to see the effect of those weights!

"If you are acting in harmony, show me that, and I will tell you that you are making progress; but if out of harmony, begone, and do not confine yourself to expounding your books, heck, go and write some books yourself. And what will you gain?"

In Book 2, Chapter 2 of the Meditations, we find Marcus Aurelius telling himself to throw away his books because they are distractions. Philosophical books are all well and good, we need to be exposed to their lessons; but there comes a point where we have to enact the teachings within those books if we are to call ourselves progressors in Stoicism rather than simply book collectors. We have to practice our philosophy. Again to quote Marcus, "Waste no more time arguing about what a good person should be, just be one." 

[Raven Caw]

How does a Stoic practice the philosophy?

"Therefore practicing each virtue always must follow learning the lessons appropriate to it, or it is pointless for us to learn about it."

We are lucky to have a lecture from Epictetus's teacher, Musonius Rufus, that is actually titled "from the lecture on practicing philosophy." As we see in the quote above, the Stoic expectation is that we must diligently practice being virtuous or else all the lessons about it will go to waste. In Stoicism, virtue is practical wisdom, it's embodied in our everyday actions. Musonius compares the philosopher to a musician. We're to train our mind and bodies as diligently as the musician practices their instrument. A capable pianist doesn't think about what their hands are doing; their hands are so well trained that they simply respond to the musician's intent. As for Stoics,

"Could someone acquire instant self-control by merely knowing that they must not be conquered by pleasures but without training to resist them? Could someone become just by learning that they must love moderation but without practicing the avoidance of excess? Could we acquire courage by realizing that things which seem terrible to most people are not to be feared but without practicing being fearless towards them? Could we become wise by recognizing what things are truly good and what things are bad but without having been trained to look down on things which seem to be good?"

No. The answer is no. The ancient Stoics did not believe that we could become better without consistent training. Musonius, like Epictetus, couldn't care less if we agree with Stoic teachings or can explain and expound on those teachings if, in the end, we don't live in virtuous harmony with the world around us.

Musonius said that their were Stoic exercises that built up our soul, exercises that built up our bodies, and exercises that built up both soul and body. He recommended that we pay the greatest attention to "the better part" that is, the mind, but the body is not to be completely neglected. After all, "The philosopher's body also must be well prepared for work because often virtues use it as a necessary tool for the activities of life." He goes on to say that, "We will train both soul and body when we accustom ourselves to cold, heat, thirst, hunger, scarcity of food, hardness of bed, abstaining from pleasures, and enduring pains."

Through Musonius we're told to get Stoicism out of our heads and to weave it into our every action. We prepare our mind and bodies for life in the world. Why would we practice hunger? Because the Stoic doesn't get to use being "hangry" as an excuse to be less than our best. Why would we abstain from pleasures? Because we can't just pay lip service to the idea that those pleasures are indifferent we have to live as if it is true.

Near the end of Discourse 1:4, Epictetus defines philosophical progress again:

"if they rise in the morning and proceed to keep and observe all this that they have learned; if they bath as a faithful person, eat as a self-respecting person, -- similarly, whatever the subject matter may be with which they have to deal, putting into practice their guiding principles...this is the one who is making progress, the one who has not traveled at random..."

Epictetus finds Stoic progress, or lack thereof, in how a person bathes and in how they eat. He expected his students to be Stoic 24/7 or, at least, to work towards being Stoic with that level of consistency. To gain that discipline, his prokoptons practiced. Yes they read texts and memorized sayings. They also meditated. They tested their bodies through voluntary discomfort. They faced their fears. Listen to Musonius' thoughts on Stoic progress:

"Likewise, we shudder at death as extreme misfortune, and we welcome life as the greatest good. When we give money away, we are distressed as if we are injured, and when we receive money, we rejoice as if we are helped. And in too many circumstances, we do not deal with our affairs in accordance with correct assumptions, but rather we follow thoughtless habit. Since I say that this is the case, the person who is practicing to become a philosopher must seek to overcome themself so that they won't welcome pleasure and avoid pain, so that they won't love living and fear death, and so that, in the case of money, they won't honor receiving over giving."

How are we practicing to meet this definition of progress? Are we truly becoming better at the art of living or are we aiming at things unrelated to virtue? 

I find that 24/7 Stoicism is a hard road to walk. I've also come to know that developing a consistent routine is key to unleashing the endurance that's necessary for the road ahead. In earlier episodes I've introduced a variety of Stoic practices and variations on those practices. Daily practices like The View from Above and the Retrospective Mediation. Stoic tools such as Physical Definition, the Dichotomy of Control, and the Stoic Reserve Clause. Mindsets like, "Festival!" and "it seemed so to him." There's been a lot and there are more practices out there in our literature. But I can guarantee, when it comes to living well, none of us require more practices, we need more practice.

[Raven Caw]

How can we know if we're missing the point of Stoicism?

"Why do you try to divert him from consciousness of his own shortcomings? Are you not willing to show him the work of virtue, that he might learn where to look for progress?"

To stay on track in life, we have to come clean about our shortcomings. The ancient Stoic students had teachers to keep them in check. Musonius said that, "the philosopher's school is a doctor's office, you must leave not pleased but pained." We have that line but we don't have the man to straighten us out. It's up to us. 

Practicing Stoicism through the exercises I've mentioned is one way to keep us on the right path. But I find that even daily practice can leave us morally plateaued. As Musonius put it, "in too many circumstances we do not deal with our affairs in accordance with correct assumptions, but rather we follow thoughtless habit." One way to know that we aren't stuck in our Stoic practice is to compare ourselves to the expected outcomes of the exercises. Do we bathe more faithfully than before, eat as a self-respecting person, can we say that we neither welcome pleasure nor avoid pain? And in making these gains, are we experiencing the expected outcomes of virtue; happiness and calm and serenity? And finally, with the strength that comes from that personal peace, how are we affecting the world?

I've shared Seneca's description of the Stoic school many times. Today I'm reworking it as a description of a Stoic:

No person has more goodness and gentleness; none has more love for human beings, nor more attention to the common good. A Stoic's goal is to be useful, to help others, and to take care, not only of themselves, but of everyone in general and of each person in particular.

Did you find yourself in that definition? Are we aiming for that outcome? Because that's the "why" of Stoicism. Everything else is either a means to becoming that person or a distraction from being that person. 

We're all Prokoptons, we're progressors; let's make progress together.

[Raven Caw]

Thank you for listening to episode sixteen of Good Fortune. Good Fortune is hosted on SoundCloud and be found on iTunes, Stitcher, and many other places. If you are willing to leave reviews on those services, they are always appreciated. Along with that, I would also appreciate reviews of The Good Fortune Handbook. If you find it useful, please take a moment to let others know.

The music is by Tryad off of their album Public Domain.

And finally, always remember, 'misfortune born nobly is good fortune.' And therefore, I wish you all good fortune until next time.

[Raven Caw]

Transcript of Good Fortune, Episode 15: Stoic Self-Care

Before we begin: The Good Fortune Handbook is available now through Amazon and Kobo. The Good Fortune Handbook consists of the transcripts of thirteen Good Fortune podcast episodes along with additional posts of the past five years from the website, Immoderate Stoic. Whether you read it cover to cover, or use the helpful appendixes to jump to specific questions about Stoic practice, this handbook is a useful companion on your Stoic journey. Available as an ebook and in print, if you'd like to support this podcast picking up a copy of The Good Fortune Handbook is a wonderful way to do so. Thanks.

[Raven Caw]

"People try to get away from it all - to the country, to the beach, to the mountains. You always wish that you could too. Which is idiotic: you can get away from it anytime you like.
By going within."

(Meditations 4:3:1-5)

Today I'll be talking about finding refuge within ourselves. We live in a world that is filled with challenges and which can task our patience, our strength, and our sanity. And although we are often unable to disengage from the tasks before us, Stoicism promises that tranquility can still be ours if we know how to find it.

Hi, I'm Matt Van Natta and this is Good Fortune. Today's questions:

  • What does Stoicism advise, when I've had my fill of life's stresses?

  • How can I find personal harmony in a discordant world?

  • Why does Stoicism recommend brief and basic mental renewal?

Alright, let's get started...

[Raven Caw]

What does Stoicism advise, when I've had my fill of life's stresses?

This episode is focused on Meditations Book 4, Chapter 3. It's a chapter that first impacted me late in 2012 just a few weeks after Hurricane Sandy had devastated the East Coast of the United States. I had been sent to New York City by the American Red Cross to manage shelter teams. Shelter management can be difficult in the smallest of disasters, but in the wake of Sandy it was a trial for all involved. Before sleep, after waking, and in whatever downtime I could find, I had a copy of the Meditations as company. I can credit 4:3 as the best counsel I ever received during those weeks.

Again to the opener; 

"People try to get away from it all - to the country, to the beach, to the mountains. You always wish that you could too. Which is idiotic: you can get away from it anytime you like. By going within. Nowhere you can go is more peaceful - more free of interruptions - than your own soul. Especially if you have other things to rely on. An instant's recollection and there it is: complete tranquility. And by tranquility I mean a kind of harmony."

In my last weeks serving in NYC, I spent my evenings managing a shelter team on Staten Island and my days sleeping on a Naval vessel. The Red Cross and other groups were housed in ship's berthing since what little local hotel space was available needed to be left open for victims of the hurricane. If you've never been in ship's quarters, well, your personal area is a bed that is a bit roomier than a coffin. There is a curtain so that people don't watch you sleep, but all other space is shared. Therefore, privacy consists of laying in bed or having no guaranteed privacy at all. So for a few weeks, even my time off shift offered very little solitude. This set up allowed me plenty of time to practice "going within" as a primary search for tranquility since without was very often a loud, challenging place.

This "going within" did not consist of long stretches of personal meditation while laying in my bunk. It was momentary, an intentional return to the harmony I had already built up through long philosophical practice. As 4:3 says, "An instant's recollection and there it is: complete tranquility." It's a basic Stoic tenet that harmony isn't found by arranging your environment, but instead in how you arrange your mind. If we had the consistently healthy mind of a Stoic Sage then we we would never be overwhelmed by life since we'd always be equal to the task at hand. But we're human. We need breaks. So Marcus says to, "Renew yourself. But keep it brief and basic." That brief, basic renewal can be found by returning our mind to the Stoic perspective of the world.

[Raven Caw]

How can I find personal harmony in a discordant world?

Marcus is searching for what he calls "complete tranquility," which he goes on to define as a "kind of harmony." It's important that he qualified this tranquility that he was seeking. Harmony denotes both engagement and movement. One harmonizes with something over the course of time. As we visualize Stoic tranquility we shouldn't think of an escape from our tasks, like a solitary relaxing hour in a hot tub. No, it's more like the flow experienced by an artisan lost in her work or the pleasure found in undertaking meaningful work. The Emperor felt out of step in life's dance. What caused this dissonance? Complaints.

"What's there to complain about?" Marcus asks. The expected answer is, nothing. But no. Instead he lists four categories of possible complaint: the misbehavior of others, our "assignment's from the world," our body, and our reputation. He then goes on to undermine those complaints. To wipe them out with a Stoic perspective.

For instance, to disarm complaints about the behavior of others, Marcus reminds himself of a few core Stoic beliefs:

"What's there to complain about? People's misbehavior? But take into consideration:

  • that rational beings exist for one another;

  • that doing what's right sometimes requires patience;

  • that no one does the wrong thing deliberately;

  • and the number of people who have hated and fought and died and been buried.

...and keep your mouth shut."

Here we're confronted with Stoic thoughts that, if accepted, disarm all complaints against others. This is the singular approach of 4:3. Marcus looks at his complaining mind and lists reasons that such complaints are unwarranted. Remember, "Nowhere you can go is more peaceful - more free of interruptions - than your own soul. Especially if you have other things to rely on. An instant's recollection and there it is: complete tranquility." What are the other things we have to rely on? The Stoic orientation to the world. It's the Stoic mindset that is being returned to through, "an instant's recollection." It's that mindset which returns us to harmony.

I expanded on the Stoic approach to difficult people in Episode 7, When People Are Obstacles. So I won't elaborate on Marcus' words here. I just want to point to his final advice, "...and keep your mouth shut." If the Emperor was expecting to perfectly rest in Stoic teachings, there would have been nothing left to speak about. And yet he tosses this final admonition at himself. I find that to be very human. It can be hard to keep from complaining about others. Sometimes the best you can do is keep your mouth shut.

Next. "Or are you complaining about the things the world assigns you? But consider two options: Providence or atoms. And all the arguments for seeing the world as a city." Throughout the Meditations Marcus reminds himself that that no matter the state of the universe, living according to virtue is the best path. For instance, this portion of 9:28:

"One way or the other: atoms or unity. If it's God, all is well. If it's arbitrary, don't imitate it." 

Third. "Or is it your body? Keep in mind that when the mind detaches itself and realizes its own nature, it no longer has anything to do with the ordinary life - the rough and the smooth, either one. And remember all you've been taught - and accepted - about pain and pleasure." Here we're reminded of Stoic indifference. Neither pain not pleasure are good or bad, they simply exist. Neither can affect our moral purpose. We can remain virtuous no matter the state of our body.

Finally. "Or is it your reputation that's bothering you? But look at how soon we're all forgotten. The abyss of endless time that swallows it all. The emptiness of all those applauding hands. The people who praise us - how capricious they are, how arbitrary. And the tiny region in which it all takes place. The whole earth a point in space - most of it uninhabited. How many people there will be to admire you, and who they are."

As emperor, Marcus lived a life of fame. His face was on money. People fawned over him to gain favor, and likely talked behind his back just as often. The Stoic Seneca once wrote, "away with the world's opinion of you - it's always unsettled and divided." Who cares what a person thinks of us if what we are doing is right? 

During the hurricane aftermath, I had multiple confrontations with a city official. This person kept providing free food to a shelter I worked at. Thing was, every single meal he brought had ham mixed in and a few of the families I served were Muslim and Jewish. This meant that a small group had to purchase food for themselves while the rest got to save up to deal with the disaster aftermath. I explained this inequity to the official and yet the ham kept coming. So I refused to serve his donated food. This led to a threat on my continued service. I had a moment where I wanted to relent, but I reminded myself that my job was to serve all my clients justly, it was someone else's job to decide if I stayed in my position. So I waited for food that everyone could eat. And, thankfully, it did come and I stayed at the shelter until it officially closed.

When ever I felt stressed in that time period I returned to myself through Stoic thoughts. Concerning equitable food choices: doing what's right sometimes requires patience. Concerning belligerent government officials: no one does the wrong thing deliberately. Concerning my standing in my organization: the people who praise us - how capricious they are, how arbitrary. I spent my time satisfied and in harmony.

[Raven Caw]

Why does Stoicism recommend "brief and basic" mental renewal?

"So keep getting away from it all - like that. Renew yourself. But keep it brief and basic. A quick visit should be enough to ward of all <...> and send you back ready to face what awaits you."

And send you back ready to face what awaits you. The Stoic response to a stressful situation is to take a breath then return to the task at hand with a renewed perspective. We don't avoid the struggle, but within the struggle we seek to thrive instead of wither.

Seneca contrasts the Stoic embrace of struggle with the rival Epicurean philosophy in On Benefits 4.13. "You Epicureans take pleasure in making a study of dull torpidity, in seeking for a repose which differs little from sound sleep, in lurking beneath the thickest shade, in amusing with the feeblest possible trains of thought that sluggish condition of your languid minds which you term tranquil contemplation, and in stuffing with food and drink, in the recesses of your gardens, your bodies which are pallid with want of exercise; we Stoics, on the other hand, take pleasure in bestowing benefits, even though they cost us labor, provided that they lighten the labors of others; though they lead us into danger, provided that they save others, though they straiten our means, if they alleviate the poverty and distresses of others."

Stoicism loves labor; not work for the sake of coin, but the struggle of being human; particularly if we are struggling to make the world a place where all people can flourish. Stoic mental renewal is meant to return us to a healthy philosophical perspective so that we may rapidly reengage with the world as it is in the hope of making it better.

"So keep this refuge in mind: the back roads of your self. Above all, no strain and no stress. Be straightforward. Look at things like a man, like a human being, like a citizen, like a mortal."

I love that phrase, "the back roads of your self." The Stoic refuge isn't the walled garden of the Epicurean, it's a series of well worn paths that are leading somewhere. Marcus is choosing to avoid the strain and stress of the highway not by making a pit stop but by taking a different and better mental road. This is Stoic renewal. It's not a vacation from our problems. It's a reminder that we are both capable and willing to engage with the world. We have to trust ourselves. If we've been laying a Stoic foundation; realizing what is and is not under our control, what is or is not worth pursuing, then we don't need to retreat when things seem tough. We need to take a breath. We need to pause and remember our better self. Then we can reengage with life as that better self.

[Raven Caw]

Thank you for listening to episode fifteen of Good Fortune. Good Fortune can be found on iTunes, Stitcher, SoundCloud, and many other places. If you are willing to leave reviews on those services, they are always appreciated. Along with that, I would also appreciate reviews of The Good Fortune Handbook. If you find it useful, please take a moment to let others know.

The music is by Tryad off of their album Public Domain.

And finally, always remember, 'misfortune born nobly is good fortune.' And therefore, I wish you all good fortune until next time.

[Raven Caw]